Home » Languages » English (Sr. Secondary) » Essay on “Death Penalty Should Be Avoided” Complete Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 and Graduation and other classes.

Essay on “Death Penalty Should Be Avoided” Complete Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 and Graduation and other classes.

Death Penalty Should Be Avoided

 

Hanging, g firing squad, electrocution, gas and lethal injection are all methods of execution used by the American government to Punish murderers. Thirty-eight out of fifty states and Washington DC have the death penalty as a method of punishment. Lynching, in contrast to capital punishment, is the unauthorized, illegal use of death as a punishment. The usual alternative to the death penalty is long-term or life imprisonment.

The subject of capital punishment has been under debate for a long time. Some believe it is a good way to punish murderers. Others call it immoral and unethical. The earliest historical records contain evidence of capital punishment. It was mentioned in the Code of Hammurabi (1750 BC). The Bible prescribed death as the penalty for more than 30 different crimes, ranging from murder (Exodus 21:12) to fornication (Deuteronomy 22:13). The Draconian Code of ancient Greece went further, imposing capital punishment for every offence. The death penalty has been inflicted in many ways now regarded as barbaric and forbidden by law almost everywhere: crucifixion, boiling in oil, drawing and quartering, impalement, beheading, burning alive, crushing, tearing asunder, stoning, and drowning are examples.

In the United States, the death penalty is currently authorized in one of five ways: hanging (the traditional method of execution throughout the English-speaking world), electrocution (introduced by New York State in 1890), the gas chamber (adopted in Nevada in 1923), firing squad (used only in Utah), or lethal injection (introduced in 1977 by Oklahoma). In most nations that still retain the death penalty for some crimes, hanging or the firing squad are the preferred methods of execution.

Statistics say that over 60% of the American public believe in using the death penalty. That is almost a two-to-one ratio. Also, it is legal in thirty-eight states and even our nation’s capital. That is a large number that thinks we should keep it. Furthermore, if a mother can have an abortion, killing an unborn child, innocent of any crime, then why can’t society use the death penalty to punish murderers who have been tried and convicted of their crime?

Numbers 35:16-19 “But if he strikes him with an iron implement, so that he dies, he is a murderer; the murderer shall surely be put to death. And if he strikes him with a stone in the hand, by which one could die, and he does die, he is a murderer; the murderer shall surely be put to death. Or if he strikes him with a wooden hand weapon, by which one could die, and he does die, he is a murderer; the murderer shall surely be put to death. The avenger of blood himself shall put the murderer to death; when he meets him, he shall be put to death.” The District Attorney of Oklahoma City, Robert Macy, described his concept of the need for the death penalty in one case: “In 1991, a young mother was rendered helpless and made to watch as her baby was executed. The mother was then mutilated and killed. The killer should not lie in some prison with three meals a day, clean sheets, cable TV, family visits and endless appeals. For justice to prevail, some killers just need to die.”

Above, I have mentioned my some of my reasons for supporting the death penalty. It is a way to make killers pay for their crimes, and to keep them from doing it again. If you take someone’s life, nothing, no matter how much money you have, or how much you want it can bring them back, but the families of the victims can see justice done, and have the killer receive the same fate as the killed.

Proponents of capital punishment have also claimed that society has the right to kill in defence of its members, just as the individual may kill in self-defence. Capital punishment was reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States in the 1970s, making it unconstitutional to impose the death penalty in certain circumstances, for example, for a crime that does not take or threaten life. However, many court decisions of the* 1980s and early 1990s have lowered bars to executions. Critics of the death penalty have always pointed to the risk of executing the innocent, although definitely established cases of thi’s sort in recent years are rare. They have also argued that one can accept a retributive theory of punishment without necessarily resorting to the death penalty; proportioning the severity of punishment to the gravity of the crime does not require the primitive rule of “a life for a life”.

About

The main objective of this website is to provide quality study material to all students (from 1st to 12th class of any board) irrespective of their background as our motto is “Education for Everyone”. It is also a very good platform for teachers who want to share their valuable knowledge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.